Thursday, July 16, 2009

Four Good Trade Unionists

I've blogged before about the cases of four UNISON activists being disciplined by the Union in circumstances which have attracted adverse comment (including from Rory Bremner!).

I am on leave tomorrow or would make sure I was at the lobby of the disciplinary hearing from 8.30 am; The Grange, Holborn Hotel, 50-60 Southampton Row, WC1B (Nearest tubes Holborn or Russell Square.)

I understand that the four have been found "guilty" - rather than comment further upon that at this time I want to say something about these four activists.

Brian Debus of Hackney UNISON is a stalwart activist who shows the sort of dedication and commitment from a lay activist which keeps our Union in operation from one year (and one decade) to the next. Brian deserves recognition and respect rather than villification.

Onay Kasab ("Kas") of Greenwich UNISON is a model of a good and committed UNISON Branch Secretary. His enviable track record as a trade unionist is the sort of thing I would expect to read about as a role model in UNISON Focus. If nominations for awards at the TUC were made on merit alone, Kas would be a recipient.

Glenn Kelly of Bromley UNISON achieved a new first this year when - at his first Conference on the platform - our General Secretary quite deliberately quoted Glenn's words in his important speech on the future of our relationship with the Labour Party. Glenn was re-elected to our National Executive in spite of wide publicity given to the charges against him. Our members nationally in local government have chosen Glenn to continue to serve on our NEC. Their views should be respected.

Suzanne Muna of the Tenant Services Authority Branch I know less well than the other three on a personal basis - but I do know that she has led a small UNISON Branch through sometimes difficult circumstances. This is the sort of voluntary work for our trade union which should be recognised and respected.

In all, these are four good trade unionists - the sort of people who would be an asset on any Branch Committee and who honour UNISON by their commitment to and work for our trade union. All hold positions in our Union to which they have recently been re-elected in the face of widespread publicity given to the allegations against them.

All four have (IMHO) the misfortune to be members of the Socialist Party - but I do feel as a Labour Party member myself that I am in no position to cast aspersions on the political choices made by other comrades. I also believe that UNISON is a trade union and not a political party and that we have room within our ranks for those of many political views (excluding only the far right).

UNISON faces a series of hard fights in the coming years as the Government (of either colour) sets out to cut public spending (worsening the recession as they attack the jobs and living standards of our members). I hope that as we face these challenges Brian, Kaz, Glenn and Suzanne are standing in our ranks, in their elected positions, as part of our collective resistance to defend the interests of our members.

We are not so well provided with excellent activists that we can afford to throw them away!

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

So should cadres for an external organisation be able to abuse and attack union members with impunity?

Jon Rogers said...

Congratulations!

You have won silliest anonymous comment of the week.

Four UNISON members are being attacked because they were associated with a leaflet which made sensible and justified criticisms.

They are no more "cadres for an external organisation" than are our UNISON reps on the Labour Party NEC.

UNISON is a trade union not a political party.

Anonymous said...

You should talk to your own cadre in your own office who explained it somewhat differently on his blog? Thought you two spoke to each other?

Anonymous said...

The Socialist Party acts as a political organisation inside UNISON producing newspapers, bulletins and election materials to promote their party/sect. Members of the party who are NOT union members leaflet UNISON organised workplaces to promote party/sect candidates during internal union elections.
The idea that in this case we are talking about four individual trade unionists who just happen to be associated with a leaflet is a fantasy. They operate to a party mandate not to a union members mandate. To claim otherwise is pure deceit. To believe otherwise is akin to accepting that the sun rotates around the earth.

Anonymous said...

Hi Jon
What can I say. It appears we just don't learn or don't care that we need hard working activists in our union.

We should at look actions not a peoples personal politics. BUT then I am just naive, I thought we were about organising, defending t&c's.

Before,anyone comes up with a smart a**e comment, I'll invite you to OUR branch to work with our team of hard working reps.

Those who know me,I have no patience for rhetoric!

Maybe that is where I have gone wrong.Perhaps I should join the careerist gravy train mob,who wouldn't recognise a member if they met one serving them in a five star hotel earning the minimum wage!

If you can't take criticism in our work then you shouldn't be in trade unionism. REAL reps like the Four have to deal with attacks every day, defending their members from atacks from employers and media.

We can ill afford to lose these reps.

John Burgess
Branchh Secretary
Barnet UNISON
http://www.barnetunison.me.uk/

Jon Rogers said...

Anon the second I take it that you are referring to Comrade Venedi (and appear to be confused in your use of the word "cadre")(although if this is an attempt at irony I offer encouragement and am sure you will soon get the hang of it).

Nick and I are allowed to have different opinions I believe (but on this occasion I don't think we do).

Anon the third, you write like a full time official in the orbit of some variant of Communism and I would strongly urge that you get out more so that you can put things into perspective.

The Socialist Party is a political Party and it is entitled to operate as such (including within UNISON). There is no UNISON Rule which prohibits Socialist Party members (who are not UNISON members) from giving out leaflets to UNISON members.

If you think that there should be such a Rule then I suggest you find a lay UNISON member to propose such a Rule Amendment to their branch and we can have the debate at Conference (all you need is to get a two thirds majority of delegates...)

In any case even if there were such a rule (which would seem more apt for - say - the former CPSU than UNISON) that has no bearing whatsoever on the reasons why the four are under attack.

Formally and officially they face discipline over their role in the production of a leaflet. You don't have to like their politics (and I don't) in order to think that their treatment is absurd and damaging to our Union.

John, I agree with you (and congratulate you on being able to associate your comments with your own name!)

The four are good trade unionists and those who are attacking them are doing no good for UNISON members.

John McD said...

Hi Jon,
sadly the 'witch hunt' within our own union goes on.
Disciplining respected and hard working activists is a disgrace and make us weaker.
I class the 4 activists as comrades in the labour movement, not because I am in the SP because I am not, but because they fight for their members and speak out.
The offending leaflet made legitimate criticisms of the decision to prevent motions being discussed at conference. The people who found the 4 guilty need to hang their head in shame!

Anonymous said...

The Morning Star/CPGB-ML acts as a political organisation inside UNISON producing newspapers, bulletins and election materials to promote their party/sect. Members of the party who are NOT union members leaflet UNISON organised workplaces to promote party/sect candidates during internal union elections.

Jon Rogers said...

I don't think anyone should confuse the Morning Star - a useful and worthwhile publication - with the CPBML (who have neither value nor utility) (nor the CPGB-ML who are another lot altogether!).

There is a wonderful guide to left groups on the What Next? website but its twenty years old now and someone really needs to update it...