The carping
critics of the Labour leadership are full of glee at the prospect that our
membership may fall below half a
million individual members and our Deputy Leader is on
a mission to do all he can to undermine our Leader, but none of this is
interesting or important. Labour is larger than it has been for years and our
Leader commands the support of the majority of our members. He is hated, and
will be undermined, by the media and the establishment. All of this is given.
With the exception of one war criminal, every Leader of
our Party in my adult life has been ridiculed and undermined by the media and
the more left-wing our Leader is perceived to be, the more attacks they will
face. This is only to be expected and, whilst faint
hearts may hope for something different, that isn’t going to happen. We
face terribly poor opinion polls and the prospect of a General Election in
which the combined impact of New Labour’s loss of Scotland and the Tory
gerrymandering of parliamentary boundaries presently appear to render the
prospect of victory (i.e. a Labour majority), under any Leader and with any
policy platform, very remote.
The ruling class and their
spokespeople are outraged that in the face of this adversity a Labour Leader
holds true to socialism rather than adopting the role which Tom Watson and his
supporters would have us adopt, as the pitiable subaltern alternative to the
Tories, offering a modest amelioration of the worst excesses of capitalism when
and if this can be afforded (in return for political careers for those whose aspirations are so attenuated
that they are happy to play that
part).
There will continue to be
weekly (if not daily) attacks upon the Labour Party under its current
leadership, and those attacks will continue to be assisted, tacitly if not
actively, by those within the Party who are opposed to that leadership. There
is absolutely nothing which can be done about this (and no hope of compromise
or accommodation with Watson and his ilk, who include many members of the
current Labour Party National Executive as well as the bulk of the
Parliamentary Labour Party).
Rather than respond to every
attempt by our opponents to set the agenda for us, socialists need to take the
opportunity of a mass Labour Party membership sympathetic to our beliefs to
build and organise support for socialism amongst working people. How are we to
do this?
Some have placed hope in
Momentum.
For my part I shall pay no
attention to Momentum, since we need neither a top down fan club for the Leader nor an organisation
crossing the boundaries of Party membership in order to do what needs to be
done. Local Momentum groups have done valuable work, but the national
organisation has no potential other than to run the leadership campaign against
the next right-wing challenge.
I don’t say this simply
because there are individuals in and around the leadership of Momentum whom I
mistrust (although there are), but because the evidence of the past eighteen
months demonstrates that an attempt to marry the worst of the undemocratic
factionalising of elements of the old Labour Left with the traditions of the
extra-parliamentary ultra-left will lead to exactly the sort of messy divorce
now being witnessed.
Once we saw an influx of
hundreds of thousands into the Party, and knew that these comrades were joining
to support a socialist Leader of our Party, we did not need a separate
organisation – we needed to organise those socialists within the Party. We
still do.
The experience in Brighton
and Hove, where this internal Party organising was done (thanks both to long
serving activists, including those associated with the Labour Representation
Committee, LRC, and newcomers organising under the banner of Momentum) is
instructive. The vitriolic response of the marginalised right-wing, which led
to the eight-month long suspension of Party organisation and the break-up of
the District Party showed that, even though the protagonists of the assault
upon local Party democracy knew that all they could achieve was to delay the
accession of socialist leadership locally, their priority was to delay what
they could not prevent.
What appears locally to be
an arrogant sense of entitlement on the part of a small clique who called the
shots when the Party was (at best) social democratic, small and in decline is,
in fact, only a local manifestation of the desperate attempts nationally of the
Tom Watsons of this world to cling to the Labour Party they knew, which would
never change the world (although it
might change theirs).
The great
majority of those who appear to us now as the right-wing of the Labour Party
are genuine and sincere in their belief that, socialism being impossible in the
here and now, the Party must retreat to the “centre-ground” in order to achieve
such electoral success as may be practicable (there are some bona fide careerists within those ranks,
who are protecting their own material interests, but they are a minority and a
generally uninteresting one).
We need to work within the
Labour Party, patiently and with determination, to mobilise those who support
socialism and, where and when we can, win over those who do not yet do so. To
do this we need to campaign both as
the Labour Party and in the Labour
Party. Let me take the second of these two dimensions first.
If we are going to campaign
as socialists in the Labour Party we
need not to have terrible misjudgements such as occurred at last year’s
Labour Party Conference when (thanks to the lack of organisation of the left) the Party changed
our Rules in order to prohibit even the consideration of “unlawful” budgets
by Labour Councils (that is to say we voted to prohibit support for budgets
which are “unlawful” because they don’t attack working class communities
sufficiently to “balance” – nothing in our rules prohibits Labour Councillors
from setting budgets which (unlawfully) prevent local authorities from
complying with their statutory duties in respect of service provision, just as
long as the books balance).
We need to put forward
socialist policies within our Labour Party branches and CLPs, with an emphasis upon
economic issues but without excluding all other questions (for example, in
Brighton and Hove it is inevitably important that we propose support for
solidarity with the Palestinian people, whose suffering is marginalised by
those who insist that opposition to the brutal oppression perpetrated by the
Israeli state is somehow racist).
We must advance our socialist ideas in a
positive and inclusive way in order to maximise support within the Party. In so
doing we will inevitably identify those committed to changing the world in the
interests of the working class, and also identify those who do not share this
objective.
As we advance socialist
policies within the Party we must also support socialist candidates in every
election, whether to local Party office, as Conference delegates or in
selections for candidates for public office. Particularly in relation to the
last of these we will face the organised opposition of a right-wing which still
has great influence and control over the Party machinery (and which is
empowered by its rootedness in the “common sense” of the political
establishment of our society).
Turning to campaigning as the Labour Party, it is obviously
important that we do all we can to support each and every campaigning
initiative that comes from the Party leadership. We need to draw our
unprecedented mass membership into whichever form of campaigning activity each
individual can support, whether that is leaflet delivery, street stalls or the
Party’s holy grail of “door knocking” (which needs not to be an exercise in asking people to tell us what our policies
should be, but should rather be about trying to win arguments with our people
for our policies).
We also need to engage Party
members and supporters in the process of policy formation for our Party. The
current policy making structures of the Party, based upon the National Policy
Forum, were (and are) a Blairite attempt to limit the influence of Party members
(and working class people) upon policy formation. Nevertheless, these flawed
and undemocratic mechanisms are what we have and we should do the best we can
with them. The challenge for socialists in the Party is to engage effectively
with the current
policy consultations, to propose motions for Conference as far as we can,
and to develop Rule Amendments which will give policy making back to the
membership as soon as is possible.
The Party, now that it is a
mass membership Party as it never was when the right-wing were in charge, needs
also to be mobilised as a force within our local communities. We cannot ask
working class people bearing the brunt of Tory austerity to await a Labour
Government, the arrival of which we cannot promise or predict. Nor can we
realistically expect that Labour local authorities, where we have them, which
are committed “lawfully” to complying with the cuts imposed by the Tory
Government will be any sort of effective defence for our communities.
Therefore. we need our mass
Labour Party to mobilise, both directly through our own membership and
indirectly, through our connections with the trade unions in particular, to
provide assistance and support to working class people in the everyday here and
now. The easiest and simplest aspect of this task is to turn up on protests and
picket lines (as Brighton Pavilion CLP did for BECTU last weekend) in order to
support trade union struggles. Beyond this reactive solidarity we also need to
explore how we can use our massive numbers proactively to organise effective
support and advocacy for our communities.
Why not Labour Party advice
sessions in local libraries or community halls helping people with their
benefit rights? Why not such sessions in conjunction with local Trades Councils
dealing with employment rights? Why not the Labour Party at the forefront of
defending the rights of tenants (and leaseholders, and the tenants of leaseholders)?
If our Rules prevent Labour local authorities from appearing to local people as
their advocates and supporters then what prevents Labour Party members from
taking on this role?
We also need to ensure that
our local Labour Parties are at the front and centre of opposition to all forms
of racism, which is why the miserable, weak and misguided position of our Party
and its leadership in relation to the EU Referendum result is so damaging. It
is not the case that everyone who voted to leave the European Union was a
racist, but all those who were not were nevertheless voting against the
interests of working class people (and it does no good to patronise those “leave”
voters by pretending respect for their terrible decision).
The pernicious progress of
the cancer of racism which has been at the heart of our country since the
Empire has been accelerated by the Referendum result (which will also
inevitably deliver economic decline). There cannot possibly be a “People’s
Brexit” and the support which all socialists should show for the Party
leadership cannot extend to pretending that this fantasy could be reality. Our
leadership needs critical friends rather more than it needs a fan club.
Post-Brexit and Post-Trump
we are living in a world in which opposition to racism and nationalism is just
about the most important principle one can imagine. There can be no doubt that
neither the Tory Government nor the right-wing of our own Party have any idea
about how to confront this horrific reality (which they themselves have brought
into existence) but that does not mean that we as socialists are all-knowing on
this subject.
It is clear that the former
proponents of a “left Exit” (or Lexit) from the European Union, some of whom
remain in denial about the disastrous consequences of the course of action
which they made the mistake of advocating, are keen to advance the nonsense of
a “People’s Brexit”. If we, as socialists, are to campaign as the Labour Party in a way which advances socialism in our
country, we cannot hope to do so by promoting such nonsense.
Our Labour Party must
promote and defend the interests of workers who are EU citizens as we defend
the interests of all workers, regardless of nationality, and we must campaign
for any future relationship with the EU to defend the interests of workers,
which include our collective interest in free movement of labour. Our socialism
is international, which means it is anti-racist, or it is nothing.
I think that being an
officer of a Constituency Labour Party in the next year or so could be quite as
interesting as having been an officer or a UNISON Branch has been for the past
quarter century…!