I realise that I am in a tiny minority in UNISON, on the left
on UNISON and generally in believing that we should use the Single Transferable
Vote (STV) to elect our General Secretary.
Happily I don’t mind being the one person who is right when
all the rest of you are wrong. (I can even be generous about your error!)
No one can predict the outcome of the current General
Secretary election. The incumbent must be the favourite and it may well be that
(given his mastery – properly or otherwise – of the machine) he may secure more
than 50% of the vote as he has three times before.
Certainly, were he to fail to do so, that would signify the
end of his tenure (the longevity of which is hardly assured otherwise in any
case given the outrageous conduct of his supporters).
For those who think it obvious that a trade union should use
an electoral system which can ensure majority support for a General Secretary
this is the amendment to move for next year’s National Delegate Conference;
Delete Schedule C.7 and replace with;
7. The method of voting shall be by single transferable vote.
The National Executive Council shall have the power to determine any other
matter of procedure or organisation or administration of or relating to the
election.
This amendment would require only a simple majority since it
amends only a Schedule to the Rule Book.
Any UNISON member could propose this in their branch as a
motion to Conference.
Or you could prepare now to oppose this.
It’s in your hands.
Are you throwing in the Burgess towel, John? This does rather read as conceding that Prentis has won.
ReplyDeleteI think the one thing that is clear is that (whoever gets however many votes) Prentis has lost.
ReplyDelete