Today I
received my first bulk email as a Retired member of UNISON, and that reminded
me that later this year UNISON members (including us Retired members) will get
to vote in an election for General Secretary. It’s not as big a deal as a
Labour leadership election, but it matters to those of us who care about UNISON
and, as befits a retired activist, this has led me to reminisce.
We didn’t
actually elect our first UNISON General Secretary, the last General Secretary
of NALGO, Alan Jinkinson, whose name I still have on a t-shirt from the last
NALGO Conference, at which I unsuccessfully moved a motion of censure of the
General Secretary because he had repudiated Lambeth branch for taking
unofficial strike action in solidarity with the Miners.
Jinkinson
served as General Secretary from vesting day (when NALGO, NUPE and COHSE merged
to form UNISON on 1 July 1993) until 31 December 1995. In UNISON’s first
General Secretary election in 1995, former NUPE General Secretary, the late Rodney
Bickerstaffe was elected, defeating Roger Bannister and Yunus Bakhsh from
the left and right-winger Peter Hunter.
Rodney’s term
of office was due to expire on 31 December 2000, but he announced in the summer
of 1999 that he would not seek re-election, giving time for the Union to look
for a replacement. Deputy General Secretary, Dave Prentis emerged as the
candidate supported by the leadership and obvious frontrunner.
Once the then
London Regional Convenor, Geoff Martin, had indicated that he would not be a
candidate, the “organised” left united behind Roger
Bannister, who came second to Prentis, ahead of Malkiat Bilku, leader of
the 1996/7 Hillingdon hospital strike. Prentis got a majority of the
votes cast and took office for the next five years.
Your humble
blogger has particular cause to remember the next election, nominations for
which opened in 2004, with voting in the spring of 2005 ahead of the end of
that term of office on 31 December 2005, because I was the candidate who came third, with
7.5% of the vote, behind hardy perennial challenger Roger Bannister, and the successful
incumbent, Dave Prentis,
who had his best ever result, winning
with three in four of the votes cast.
Five years later,
in 2010, the UNISON National Executive Council (NEC) were called to an unprecedented
additional meeting in January to agree a timetable for a further General
Secretary election, although – as supporters
of Mr Prentis were then eager to point out – the incumbent General
Secretary could have remained in office at that time without a further
election, as he was then within five years of his retirement age.
Dave Prentis won
once again, and again defeated Roger Bannister and also Paul Holmes (who
managed, in spite of my support, to improve somewhat on my showing five years
previously). Having won once more, the General Secretary led on the creation of
five
posts of Assistant General Secretary, which was widely seen as an attempt
to create a field of potential successors.
In the
following year the concept
of a retirement age was itself retired and so, in the run up to UNISON
Conference 2015, the Union therefore anticipated a further election without
knowing whether the incumbent would seek re-election. As an NEC member I made
something of a nuisance of myself chasing up when the General Secretary
election would take place. Eventually
it did.
Dave Prentis
did seek re-election in 2015 and was successful, in spite of opposition from
Heather Wakefield (who came second), Roger Bannister and John Burgess. More
information about this election is in the public domain than previous elections
because of the decision
of the Assistant Certification Officer arising from the gross misconduct of
the former London Regional Secretary.
UNISON needs to
reconsider the
recommendations of the Assistant Certification Officer ahead of the
forthcoming General Secretary election, which could be quite a different
election if it doesn’t include an incumbent candidate (though I don’t
necessarily make that assumption).
The largest
trade union in the country could be vital to the resistance to Johnson’s
Government but recent experience doesn’t really give much cause for optimism
that it will. The General Secretary election might be an opportunity for UNISON
members to make a meaningful choice.
What are your thoughts on the way it's shaping up.
ReplyDelete