In a week in
which a leading figure on the Labour left bizarrely called for disaffiliation
of trade unions from our Party it may seem idiosyncratic to continue to be
interested in the fate of another minor Party.
But – having advanced
the argument here some time ago – I was pleased to see Owen Jones take
to a wide audience the plausible case for Green Party affiliation to
Labour.
It was not too
much of a shock to see that argument comprehensively
rebuffed by the Green Party’s two leaders – albeit their arguments are
fairly slender.
Caroline Lucas
and Jonathan Bartley justify their continued electoral project on the grounds
that they have some better policies than our Party (they already oppose Trident
and we haven’t quite got there yet), they exist to challenge an economic
orthodoxy based upon a belief in endless economic growth – and they are
committed to activism (sometimes including civil disobedience).
Anyone who
wants to win the political arguments which the Green Party could still have
with a left-led Labour Party must know that what winning will look like will be
influencing a left-led Labour Government. Those of us who want to see
unilateral nuclear disarmament (for example) would welcome new allies to help
us win that argument in the Party and trade unions.
Equally, a real
challenge to economic orthodoxy must encompass a renewed attempt to empower
democracy against finance – and the only prospect of doing that in the next ten
years (or, for that matter in my adult lifetime) is through the election of a
Labour Government committed to socialist policies.
If the political
and ideological justifications for the continuing Green electoral project (on a
national scale) are so slender as to disappear when you turn them sideways, the
argument that Greens are activists and that this differentiates them from
Labour’s left simply fails to stand up to examination. Since the 2015 General
Election and leadership election, tens of thousands of committed activists have
been among the multitude who have joined or rejoined Labour.
Lucas and
Bartley are looking away from the reality of national politics in Britain in
order to justify an electoral project the only material consequence of which
(under a First Past the Post electoral system) can only be – outside Brighton
Pavilion perhaps – to win enough votes in a few Labour/Tory marginals to provide
evidence for those who want to accuse the Greens of “splitting the vote” and
letting the Tories in.
This is not a
negligible consideration given that the two main Parties are close in the
polls, the Tory Government are trying to introduce
identity checks to discourage voting by those least likely to support them,
the next General Election may be fought on new
boundaries of benefit to the political right, and the establishment and
their allies (including those
within the labour movement) will pull out all the stops to scupper the
prospect of a socialist Government.
In these
circumstances it may be a hopeful sign that a Labour
movement campaign has been launched which – among its objectives – supports
the electoral reform which the Green Party leaders suggest is a sine qua non of any future cooperation
with Labour. Although our first priorities in Government must be the social and
economic policies needed to repair the damage done to working class communities
by austerity, we do need to address the need for constitutional change.
This isn’t just
about the electoral system for Westminster – which requires the sort of
informed debate we did not have in 2012 – but about abolishing an unelected
House of Parliament and addressing the absurd and archaic monarchy.
-->
With a once in
a lifetime chance of socialist victory in a General Election we all need to be
prepared to re-examine long held views – and bring together all those who want
to see the transformation of society.
No comments:
Post a Comment