-->
The best day of
my working life was 30 November 2011, when I led (locally) the largest and
most solid strike I had ever been involved in, as our public service trade
unions took united action to defend our pensions. (Though not
everyone approved…)
The eventual
settlement of that pensions dispute was not
something which I was happy with (albeit it was – eventually - supported by
ballots of members of most of the unions involved – including
UNISON).
Without doubt,
part of the reason why members voted for the settlement was because those who
were close to retirement were protected (in the Local Government Pension Scheme
(LGPS) by the underpin.
Today, firefighters – and judges (!) – have won a legal case against the age discrimination implicit in protecting from adverse changes to pensions the older workers (who were least impacted) and not the younger workers (who were hardest hit).
Today, firefighters – and judges (!) – have won a legal case against the age discrimination implicit in protecting from adverse changes to pensions the older workers (who were least impacted) and not the younger workers (who were hardest hit).
The obvious
implication of this decision of the Court of Appeal (which the Government will
surely seek to appeal to the Supreme Court) is that younger members of public
service pension schemes (who were excluded from “transitional protections” as
the unions conceded detrimental changes to our pension schemes in 2012) could bring
age discrimination claims.
This poses
challenges to our trade unions who may be asked to support cases which
implicitly criticise the settlements arrived at following ballot results in
2012 – but surely trade union support for claims of age discrimination would be
better than leaving the field clear to “no win no fee” solicitors?
No comments:
Post a Comment