There is
nothing new or unusual about mounting attacks upon the Labour Party in the run
up to an election in anticipation of which the establishment is fearful that
the Party’s policies may be contrary to their interests.
In 1924 the Daily
Mail splashed details of the forged
“Zinoviev letter”, claiming implausibly that the British Labour Party took
orders from the Soviet Communist Party. The subsequent General Election saw the
defeat of the first Labour Government.
Two decades
later, in the run up to Labour’s first majority Government and our most famous
victory, Winston Churchill famously prophesied that an incoming Labour
Government would
create a Gestapo.
In the 1970s,
Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson became convinced that
elements of the deep state were plotting against him (and not without
cause) – and smears against Labour Leaders alleging that they were somehow in
cahoots with the Kremlin continued against Michael
Foot and – of course, more recently, the
current Leader.
The British
establishment has a “love-hate” relationship with our Party. It loves having an
alternative Party of Government to facilitate Parliamentary democracy, and it
loves those within our Party whose political ambition is limited to
ameliorating the conditions of the majority within the broad framework of the
status quo.
But our
establishment – our ruling class – hates the potential for social
transformation inherent in the nature of our Labour Party, as a Party founded
on and by the organised working class. Therefore we can anticipate a gathering
crescendo of attacks upon our Party and its leadership as the General Election
draws nearer.
History
suggests that sane observers should not take this attacks too seriously – and that
Labour Party members and supporters, particularly those who see the crying need
for a socialist Labour Government, should concentrate on winning arguments for
our policies with voters.
No comments:
Post a Comment