One significant
advantage of my genuinely-held view that it would have been wrong to rush to
draw conclusions from last month’s General Election defeat is that I have been
able to consider the views of those who have been less reticent before forming
my own.
Mike
Phipps in Labour Briefing wasn’t over-hasty in publishing his opinions last
week (and drew upon good work by many other comrades), and I find I agree with
much of what he has to say. I would add that, amongst the many who did express
their views more swiftly after 12 December, Lee
Jasper had a lot to say that needs to be listened to.
However, now
that the
NEC has set a timetable for a leadership election, the debate about what
happened on 12 December has become inseparable from the debate about who we
elect as Leader (and Deputy Leader).
This is
unfortunate, if unavoidable, since it will tend to narrow the focus of politics
back around the Westminster bubble and to frame our choices between career
politicians who want to lead the Party (as opposed to the accidental Leader
whom many of us have been proud to support over the past four years).
There can be no
candidate with decades of experience of putting principle before advancement,
because the small number of individuals to whom the history of the past decades
have given that experience will not be in the running this time round.
Socialists will not find the perfect candidate for Labour Leader is on offer in
2020.
I would rather
see the debate about our election defeat develop into a genuine debate about
what our Party and its mass membership should be doing, rather than who should
be leading us as we do it. Since that is not possible, I am inclined to the
view that Constituency Labour Parties, before deciding whom to nominate, ought
to put some questions to candidates (and then make our decision on nomination
based upon their answers).
We could ask
some policy questions of course (particularly to test the anti-racist
credentials of would-be Leaders), but it will be more important to ask
questions about Party democracy (such as whether the Leader will respect
Conference policy decisions, and support the strengthening and deepening of the
positive aspects of the recent Democracy review) and about how we mobilise our
membership to resist the Tories and build our communities.
In 2015 the
emergence of the most unlikely candidate galvanised a grassroots campaign.
Since we cannot expect such inspiration from above in 2020, if we want to
mobilise our own grassroots then we need to find a way to do it ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment